"the surname Dzhugashvili is not Georgian, but Ossetian ( Osset. Dzugaty , from dzug - “flock, herd”), which is only given the Georgian form: the phoneme “dz” in the dialect of South Ossetians is pronounced as “j”, the ending of Ossetian surnames "you" are replaced by the Georgian "shvili" (son) [1] . The surname Dzugaty-Dzugaev itself is widespread in Ossetia. Its representative is, for example, the Ossetian poet Georgy Dzugaev ."
Yes, interesting but i am not sure Stalin knew his ossetian background. Because it seems his great granfather is from southern ossetia. It is possible that there are ossetian/georgianized ossetian beside his great-grand father among his ancestors. But for now, we know only this.
"Little is known of the family of Besarion Jughashvili. His grandfather, Zaza Jughashvili (born c. 1780), was involved in the 1804 Mtiuleti rebellion against the Russian Empire, which had only annexed eastern Georgia (Kartli-Kakheti) in 1801. Zaza was possibly of Ossetian background, with historians Simon Sebag Montefiore and Ronald Grigor Suny both suggesting he came from the village of Geri, near modern South Ossetia, though this claim can not be proven.[1][2][b] Zaza escaped the uprising and moved to Didi Lilo, a village about 16 kilometres (9.9 mi) away from the capital, Tiflis (now Tbilisi). He worked as a serf for Prince Badur Machabeli, tending to his vineyards. There he had a son, Vano, who in turn had two sons: Giorgi, and Besarion, who was likely born around 1850.[1][3] Vano died young, likely before he turned 50, while Giorgi worked as an innkeeper until he was killed by bandits.[3]"
Once again this liar completely misrepresents history and gaslights the 62 million lives genocided by psychopath jews in the russian(jewish) revolution. Disgusting, but your shitty articles arent going to work, people can simply look at the pictures of the first communist government, completely jewish, They can read books like "The wolf of the kremlin" where Lazar Kaganovich, a jewish mass murderer says quite clearly "Whatever is good for the Jews" Uncle Levick had said to him. "Follow only that line of reasoning".
its not clear how accurate these statistics are, for example an ukrainian jew could have listed his nationality as either jewish or ukrainian. speaking of which, I'd have liked a more detailed comparison to wiltons allegations. you say "All one needs to do is compare this information to that given earlier" but couldn't have wilton done the same in reverse if he were here today?
Well not quite, because Wilton provided no evidence for any of his claims, only obviously biased personal testimony, whereas the information I review comes from the official records for the institutions of state and party as well as biographical information on their members. As time has passed, things have gotten much more transparent than they were in the days of the revolution. Otherwise, I've seen no evidence that self-misidentification was enough of a problem to skew the data for total party membership; do you have any?
I really dislike these articles which just paste together quotes or paraphrases of the opinions of others, while excluding any opinions that don't fit preselected conclusions, rather than collecting data and drawing conclusions more coherently. Usually the quotes aren't even extracted by the author, as with this case, but are just copied and pasted around the Internet verbatim (a very old tactic); I think that accounts for a lot of the confusion. I assume, e.g., that the author said "Jewish historian Dr. Angelo Solomon Rappoport wrote: 'The Jews in Russia, in their total mass, were responsible for the Revolution'" not because he knew he was lying and that the actual book, ancient but available online, doesn't include that line, but probably because at some point along the way this was another person's commentary on that section of Rappaport's book which somehow got swapped for the original. There are a few other errors like that, here.
It mostly relies on cherrypicking often from apparently sound authorities (like Encyclopaedia Judaica), with plenty of ellipses, to include either tepid "admissions" (like "Individual Jews played an important role in the early stages of Bolshevism and the Soviet regime"—is this supposed to be a bombshell?) or to mischaracterize the source itself.
There are also plenty of lies as well as quotes taken from clearly untrustworthy figures like Joseph Goebbels himself. As for the lies, the insistence on Lenin's Jewishness is interesting. I searched through Trotsky's book Stalin and couldn't find that postcard, but his description of Lenin is telling: "at least one-quarter Jewish, spoke Yiddish in his home, and was married to a Jewess." There's no "at least," here. In fact some dispute whether he even had one Jewish grandparent, but even if that were the case he was not aware of it. He also didn't speak Yiddish and married a Russian; he viewed the Jews as an anomaly to disintegrate with time unlike the other nationalities. People occasionally do a similar thing with Stalin. This author didn't go so far as to allege Stalin was Jewish, but he did repeat the familiar myths like "Stalin had three wives, all of them Jews"—he had two, both Georgian. There are also fake statistics—the author doesn't care enough to do more than regurgitate narrative-affirming lies—like those from Elmhurst's The World Hoax, whose statistics actually come from Robert Wilton whom I cover. There's too much wrong to right, here.
It does bring up American and British intelligence, which might have truth to it. I know they took seriously even the Protocols for a time, but I don't know enough about it to say much else. At the time, nobody knew anything about what was happening in Russia so disinformation attempts were very fruitful.
All in all, very scattered, disorganized, schizophrenic, riddled with errors and lies, but it doesn't challenge what I've written which should give a full and impartial image.
Good read, guess we've all learned that Lativo-Bolshevism was the real enemy all along, at least if we apply the logic of anti-semites to reality.
Fantastic article very informative, keep up the great work
Stalin's father was likely Ossetian. Result of his grandson's ydna test and etymology of his surname supported this hypotesis.
ydna
https://twitter.com/Peter_Nimitz/status/1572225641478754305?s=20&t=1u14ZfH9BjOUxob5KeIbWA
surname
"the surname Dzhugashvili is not Georgian, but Ossetian ( Osset. Dzugaty , from dzug - “flock, herd”), which is only given the Georgian form: the phoneme “dz” in the dialect of South Ossetians is pronounced as “j”, the ending of Ossetian surnames "you" are replaced by the Georgian "shvili" (son) [1] . The surname Dzugaty-Dzugaev itself is widespread in Ossetia. Its representative is, for example, the Ossetian poet Georgy Dzugaev ."
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%94%D0%B6%D1%83%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%B8
Interesting, added a footnote (8)
Yes, interesting but i am not sure Stalin knew his ossetian background. Because it seems his great granfather is from southern ossetia. It is possible that there are ossetian/georgianized ossetian beside his great-grand father among his ancestors. But for now, we know only this.
"Little is known of the family of Besarion Jughashvili. His grandfather, Zaza Jughashvili (born c. 1780), was involved in the 1804 Mtiuleti rebellion against the Russian Empire, which had only annexed eastern Georgia (Kartli-Kakheti) in 1801. Zaza was possibly of Ossetian background, with historians Simon Sebag Montefiore and Ronald Grigor Suny both suggesting he came from the village of Geri, near modern South Ossetia, though this claim can not be proven.[1][2][b] Zaza escaped the uprising and moved to Didi Lilo, a village about 16 kilometres (9.9 mi) away from the capital, Tiflis (now Tbilisi). He worked as a serf for Prince Badur Machabeli, tending to his vineyards. There he had a son, Vano, who in turn had two sons: Giorgi, and Besarion, who was likely born around 1850.[1][3] Vano died young, likely before he turned 50, while Giorgi worked as an innkeeper until he was killed by bandits.[3]"
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Besarion_Jughashvili
Excellent and erudite article
Good work
Once again this liar completely misrepresents history and gaslights the 62 million lives genocided by psychopath jews in the russian(jewish) revolution. Disgusting, but your shitty articles arent going to work, people can simply look at the pictures of the first communist government, completely jewish, They can read books like "The wolf of the kremlin" where Lazar Kaganovich, a jewish mass murderer says quite clearly "Whatever is good for the Jews" Uncle Levick had said to him. "Follow only that line of reasoning".
Why are you trying to cover up jewish crime?
its not clear how accurate these statistics are, for example an ukrainian jew could have listed his nationality as either jewish or ukrainian. speaking of which, I'd have liked a more detailed comparison to wiltons allegations. you say "All one needs to do is compare this information to that given earlier" but couldn't have wilton done the same in reverse if he were here today?
Well not quite, because Wilton provided no evidence for any of his claims, only obviously biased personal testimony, whereas the information I review comes from the official records for the institutions of state and party as well as biographical information on their members. As time has passed, things have gotten much more transparent than they were in the days of the revolution. Otherwise, I've seen no evidence that self-misidentification was enough of a problem to skew the data for total party membership; do you have any?
10th congress politburo is 3/5 jewish in your table. I guess you ignored Rykov. Additionally kamenev may half russian.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politburo_of_the_10th_Congress_of_the_Russian_Communist_Party_(Bolsheviks)
Sure.
I really dislike these articles which just paste together quotes or paraphrases of the opinions of others, while excluding any opinions that don't fit preselected conclusions, rather than collecting data and drawing conclusions more coherently. Usually the quotes aren't even extracted by the author, as with this case, but are just copied and pasted around the Internet verbatim (a very old tactic); I think that accounts for a lot of the confusion. I assume, e.g., that the author said "Jewish historian Dr. Angelo Solomon Rappoport wrote: 'The Jews in Russia, in their total mass, were responsible for the Revolution'" not because he knew he was lying and that the actual book, ancient but available online, doesn't include that line, but probably because at some point along the way this was another person's commentary on that section of Rappaport's book which somehow got swapped for the original. There are a few other errors like that, here.
It mostly relies on cherrypicking often from apparently sound authorities (like Encyclopaedia Judaica), with plenty of ellipses, to include either tepid "admissions" (like "Individual Jews played an important role in the early stages of Bolshevism and the Soviet regime"—is this supposed to be a bombshell?) or to mischaracterize the source itself.
There are also plenty of lies as well as quotes taken from clearly untrustworthy figures like Joseph Goebbels himself. As for the lies, the insistence on Lenin's Jewishness is interesting. I searched through Trotsky's book Stalin and couldn't find that postcard, but his description of Lenin is telling: "at least one-quarter Jewish, spoke Yiddish in his home, and was married to a Jewess." There's no "at least," here. In fact some dispute whether he even had one Jewish grandparent, but even if that were the case he was not aware of it. He also didn't speak Yiddish and married a Russian; he viewed the Jews as an anomaly to disintegrate with time unlike the other nationalities. People occasionally do a similar thing with Stalin. This author didn't go so far as to allege Stalin was Jewish, but he did repeat the familiar myths like "Stalin had three wives, all of them Jews"—he had two, both Georgian. There are also fake statistics—the author doesn't care enough to do more than regurgitate narrative-affirming lies—like those from Elmhurst's The World Hoax, whose statistics actually come from Robert Wilton whom I cover. There's too much wrong to right, here.
It does bring up American and British intelligence, which might have truth to it. I know they took seriously even the Protocols for a time, but I don't know enough about it to say much else. At the time, nobody knew anything about what was happening in Russia so disinformation attempts were very fruitful.
All in all, very scattered, disorganized, schizophrenic, riddled with errors and lies, but it doesn't challenge what I've written which should give a full and impartial image.